India is a vast and diverse nation, where every region has its unique challenges and needs. However, in recent years, it appears that Prime Minister Narendra Modi has been more focused on global issues while sidelining or neglecting pressing domestic crises. His proactive stance on the Ukraine-Russia war and his international engagements suggest that he aspires to be seen as a ‘global peace mediator.’ But the crucial question remains: why did he not show the same seriousness when Manipur was engulfed in violence?
Ukraine-Russia War vs. Manipur Violence
Prime Minister Modi has repeatedly positioned himself as a mediator in the Ukraine-Russia war, advocating for peace and urging global leaders to resolve the crisis diplomatically. His statements—such as “This is not an era of war”—have been widely publicized, reinforcing India’s image as a responsible global power.
However, while Modi was busy engaging in international diplomacy, Manipur was burning. Ethnic violence erupted in May 2023 and continued for months, leading to the displacement of thousands, the death of hundreds, and deepening communal tensions. Homes were torched, communities were torn apart, and the state was left in turmoil. Yet, the Prime Minister remained largely silent. Even when he eventually spoke in Parliament, his words felt more like a formality than a heartfelt response. The question then arises—doesn’t a Prime Minister’s duty begin with his own people?
Is the Nobel Peace Prize the Hidden Agenda?
Many political analysts speculate that Modi’s global peace initiatives, particularly his involvement in the Ukraine-Russia conflict, might be driven by a larger ambition—securing a Nobel Peace Prize.
Over the years, Modi’s diplomatic strategies have consistently projected him as a ‘peace champion’ on the world stage. From balancing ties between the U.S. and Russia to hosting the G20 summit with a focus on ‘peaceful solutions,’ every move appears carefully designed to cement his global statesman image. But in the process, India’s internal crises have been pushed to the background.
If the Prime Minister’s priority is to be recognized as a global peacemaker, then his domestic responsibilities should not be sacrificed for this ambition. The suffering of Manipur’s people deserved his immediate attention, yet it took months for him to even acknowledge their plight.
Domestic Issues First, Global Image Later
It is undeniable that India must play a crucial role in global affairs. As an emerging superpower, the country’s presence in international diplomacy is vital. However, leadership begins at home. Before mediating peace talks between warring nations, shouldn’t the Prime Minister ensure that his own country is at peace?
If India truly aspires to be a ‘Vishwaguru’ (global leader), it must start by addressing its internal conflicts. Manipur’s crisis has revealed an alarming reality—that the Modi government tends to focus more on global optics than on resolving domestic unrest. If this pattern continues, it could erode public trust in leadership.
Conclusion
Prime Minister Modi’s foreign policy and global diplomacy raise several important questions. Instead of investing time and effort into mediating peace in the Ukraine-Russia war, wouldn’t he have been a stronger leader if he had prioritized Manipur’s suffering?
A leader is remembered not just for his international influence but also for how he responds to the pain of his own people. India’s ambition to rise as a global power should not come at the cost of neglecting its own citizens. Mr. Prime Minister, before advocating peace for the world, ensure peace in your own nation first!
( Rajiv Khare National Deputy Editor)
Leave a comment